Posted August 9, 2006
The Mittal Deal And Fleecing Of Wealth In Liberia
"Sometimes, whenever kings or chiefs were
willing and able to work with colonial government, the systems operated by
what was called "indirect rule" (Basil Davidson)
Even after years of colonialism, many African
governments continue to serve the interests of European companies and their
governments, while their own countries are posting unimaginable and
astronomical unemployment and inflation rates. Instead of European
governments and companies directly extracting wealth from Africans as they
did during colonialism and post-colonialism, they are now using
multi-national companies such as BP, Exxon Mobil, Shell, and Mittal steal –
to name a few – to keep African countries in a perpetual state of economic
stagnation, and depression.
During the last few months of the
transitional government, there were many deals made allocating mining
concessions. One of these was an estimated $900-950 million dollars deal
with Mittal Steel. Recent legal analysis has shown that the Mittal contract
is unfavorable to Liberia and gives all the benefits to the steel company.
It was also alleged that money exchanged hands providing an incentive to the
transitional government to agree to the unfavorable terms of the contract.
The 25-year contract would give Mittal control of a huge reserve of iron
ore, Liberia's biggest economic asset. First and foremost, the NTGL lacked
a legal mandate to negotiate any long-term concessions. Deals with Mittal
Steal, Firestone, and other companies that have significant economic impact
should not have been carried out by a transitional government.
Thinking back to the Firestone economic
tragedy referred to as a contract, and the current Mittal deal has left me
asking myself, why do we have so much faith in Foreigners and their empty
promises of investment and economic development in Africa/Liberia? Just
like Firestone, Mittal steel has told the Liberian people that its 25 year
contract would provide jobs and bring investment to the country. Did our
transitional leaders ever stop to think just how much revenue and profit
Mittal steel will generate in the 25 years? If you think I am
over-reacting, take a look at how much profit Shell, Exxon mobile, BP, and
the rest of the oil companies are generating in revenues and profit
quarterly, while in Nigeria, the Niger Delta, and the Congo, citizens who
live next to oil exploration sites would be lucky to make enough money to
send their little ones to school. Why use oil companies when I can use an
example closer to home. The Firestone Corporation has operated in Liberia
for decades, and failed to make maximum economic impact on the Liberian
economy. After years of exploiting Liberia, what did Firestone do for
Liberia in terms of infrastructure development and investment, other than
poor working conditions and high production quotas? To be fair to
Firestone, they built some schools for employees and their children on the
Firestone Plantation (sarcasm intended).
Let's not allow our leaders and law makers to
make decisions to hand over control of some of our biggest assets over to
foreign operators and companies who, - to be quite honest – don't have
Liberia at heart. Why are we allowing these companies to run Liberia under
25 to 30 year leases? We should not allow multinational companies to run
Liberia and call it "free market". Modern imperialists are not interested
in owning foreign lands but in controlling foreign markets and resources,
and in some cases their governments; and this is what African leaders are
now giving away in the name of economic development and investment. When
we compare Africa's economic development to that of Europe, we see that from
the moment Europeans carved up the continent and put Africans to slave
labor, they were advancing themselves organizationally and technologically.
The Mittal deal is nothing more than a perpetuation of the exploitative
economic system created by Africa's colonial "masters"; a system of economic
dependency that's choked and continues to choke Africa, while creating
wealth for countries other than African countries.
Thanks to our selfish self seeking
POLI-TIC-ians, one can't blame companies that are taking advantage of so
called investment opportunities in Liberia. Many of these companies can
easily bribe their way to life time contracts that never seem to leave
Liberia and Africa better off than when they saw it. Firestone signed a
contract for 99 years, making Firestone a multi billionaire dollar empire..
The firestone family – not the company itself – makes and spends more
money a year than the government of Liberia. Let's us not forget that
European/western companies have never cared about Africa's development,
despite what they say. If nations in Africa become economic competitors,
and economically vibrant, where will multi-national companies get their
cheap resources and billion dollar profits?
Everyone is enjoying Africa's wealth except
for Africa and Africans. If it isn't the Europeans, it's the Lebanese, and
now the Indians; why not the Africans? When will we say enough is enough?
Liberians should continue to raise concerns about the Mittal Steel
contract, and encourage the current administration to thoroughly evaluate
this contract and other major contracts for the benefit of Liberia and the
Liberian people. Those of us who have the opportunity and not necessarily
the power, should continue to question and bring attention to not only the
Mittal deal, but those of Firestone, other awards and permits signed by NTGL,
and all future deals, because these deals have financial significance and
potential long-term effects on national development.