Posted August 28, 2006

 
On Journalistic Ethics:
limitation Is Censorship; Censorship Is Illegal
 

Two days after Press Secretary Cyrus Wleh Badio said the Executive Mansion was considering the option of selecting specific media institutions to provide media coverage, the president of Liberia strongly denounced the press, accusing of it committing unethical conduct.  

The press secretary, at a news briefing on August 21, 2006, said he was considering option of selecting specific media institutions to provide media coverage. He also said he is contemplating limiting press briefings from President Sirleaf to the issuance of press statements. 

Media analysts believe the press secretary’s warning is an attempt to draw the attention of the media institutions to alleged errors committed by their reporters at the Executive Mansion and other places of government. This is a routine exercise of the press secretary. 

The press secretary made some good points to support his claims except that he threatened to take the law into his own hands by his limitation and selective press coverage warnings.  Among his claims that are worthy of support are misquotations, half truths, and distortions of information. Though the Press Union of Liberia said it was pleased with the performance of its members, a reaction suggesting that its members have not committed any unethical act, it is an observable fact that where there is a fire there must be a smoke.  

Cyrus Badio is a seasoned media professional who knows the ethics, value, and weakness of journalists. His claims may not be all wrong. What some citizens also seem to be saying is that the work journalists do is important but isn’t being done well enough. Many journalists will agree to this.  

Today, journalists including those in the developed world are faced with the problems of accuracy. Accuracy is the most important characteristic of any story. Accuracy is essential in every detail. Every name must be spelled correctly; every quote must be exactly what was said; every set of numbers must add up.  

However, the question in the air now is whether the errors committed by reporters of some media institutions as alleged by Cyrus Badio are deliberate or just human errors and part of everyday problems journalists are faced with.  

The press secretary in his press briefing did not say if these errors were deliberate.

The press secretary as an experienced journalist will agree that journalism, no matter where, presents more complications. Usually, as a reporter you only have a few hours, at most a few days, to try to learn as many facts as possible. Then, even in such a limited time, journalists may accumulate enough information for a story of 2000 words. All editors and publishers will agree that errors are frequently made while trying to beat the deadline-though not deliberate-journalists like any human are bound to err.  

However, attempting to select specific media institutions to provide media coverage because of everyday errors committed by reporters is not justifiable and ca be considered as press censorship and will not achieve the needed results of press freedom in the country. 

 It may not only be considered as press censorship, but gives credence to rumors circulating among Liberians that certain media institutions have been bought to play to the tune and sing praises to the executive.  

One important fabric of the Liberian society that is not noticed as it takes the back seat is the rule of law. Journalists like any other citizens are subject to the constitution of Liberia.  

Article 15 of the Liberian Constitution states: 

a. Every person shall have the right to freedom of expression, being fully responsible for the abuse thereof. This right shall not be curtailed, restricted or enjoined by government save during an emergency declared in accordance with this Constitution.

b. The right encompasses the right to hold opinions without interference and the right to knowledge. It includes freedom of speech and of the press, academic freedom to receive and impart knowledge and information and the right of libraries to make such knowledge available. It includes non-interference with the use of the mail, telephone and telegraph. It likewise includes the right to remain silent.

c. In pursuance of this right, there shall be no limitation on the public right to be informed about the government and its functionaries.  

d. Access to state owned media shall not be denied because of any disagreement with or dislike of the ideas express. Denial of such access may be challenged in a court of competent jurisdiction.

e. This freedom may be limited only by judicial action in proceedings grounded in defamation or invasion of the rights of privacy and publicity or in the commercial aspect of expression in deception, false advertising and copyright infringement. 

On the other hand, the president, other than misquotations and misrepresentation of press briefings and statements, publicly accused the press of receiving Payola or freebies, and serving as agents of character assassination and agents of blackmail, and publishing outright lies.  

The president also alleged that good professional ethics have been substituted for check-book Journalism. In journalism, checkbook journalism is an act of paying for a story from a source. The president did not say which media institutions in Liberia are paying sources for stories, but media analysts in Liberia doubt there is any media institution in Liberia that is capable of buying stories from sources when their reporters are not paid enough for the job they do coupled with other financial issues. 

However, an American journalist said, “But I don’t believe that paying sources is unethical, as long as it’s disclosed to the readers; in some cases I think it makes for better journalism. It gives a fair share of the profits to sources that spend time and take risks.”  

Though the president did not make reference to a particular case where journalists took bribe to assassinate character and blackmail, and published outright lies in the press, media analysts believe the president’s allegations are counterproductive. The president recent public attacks on the press also have the potential to further jeopardize the fragile relationship between the press and the executive. 

The Press Union of Liberia has been waiting on the publication of findings from the Ministry of Justice for complaint of press intimidation and brutalities that were channeled through the president about two months ago. The chief executive promised the press that findings of the investigation will be made published.  

The media is anticipating the results of the investigation of the fire incident that took place at the Executive Mansion on July 26, 2006. Still, the media is currently investigating circumstances surrounding the shooting incident at the SSS boss residence which resulted to the death of Emmanuel Williams, a body guard to the SSS boss. 

These and many day-to day events in post war Liberia may not be addressed fully in the presence of selective media coverage. It is therefore advisable that the press and the executive must cooperate to remove the impasse so as to adequately, accurately, objectively, and fairly inform the Liberian public of events as they occur and tend to shape the destiny of the country.  

Media institutions can be asked to retract to stories that are reported erroneously in part. In the case of suspected libel resulting from actual malice, let the law take its due course if the victims deem it necessary. By doing so, Liberia becomes a country of law not of men.

 

Writes,
Thomas Kai Toteh
tnyantk@yahoo.com

 

www.runningafrica.com
Powered by The African Media Network, Lawrenceville, GA USA.  Gabriel S. Gworlekaju Jr. President/CEO;  Patrick K. Manjoe Executive Director