Posted November 29, 2006

 
The Liberian Drama Of Curbing Corruption
 

By Alex Redd
Reno, Nevada

Liberia is a beautiful country with rich natural resources but it is ravaged by endemic corruption through bad governance. The result is that though most people work hard they are trapped in terrible poverty. Following the 14-year-old vicious war that terrified the populace, NGOs provide 90% of health care, while roads are deplorable with some public amenities faintly in existence. Hustlers and gangs roam the streets to crook and snatch away other�s belongings while former soldiers are jobless. The new Liberian government, with its annual budget of 12.9 million, is literally trying to invite international goodwill to redirect Liberia on its rightful path to recovery. Nevertheless, few would quibble with recent arrests of former officials of the Gyude Bryant interim administration on suspicion of tampering with public coffers.
 
Interestingly, this is not the first time in Liberian history for corrupt officials to be arrested and publicly ridiculed for stealing money. Some cabinet officials in the Samuel Doe administration were publicly flogged after being caught red-handed. Corrupt practices in the Liberian society is so entrenched that virtually any government that prides itself on eradicating corruption tends to fall prey to the same endemic circle. Judging from experience, Liberian leaders have not been able to measure up to the elimination of corruption. For instance, Charles Taylor�s inaugural speech was primed with �eradicating corruption� at its highest level. According to Samuel Doe and his enlisted collaborators that butchered the sitting president in 1980, the primary reason for regime change was �entrenched corruption� that alienated the indigenous people from getting fair share of the country�s wealth. Even Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, the new female president, asserted the elimination of corruption in her inaugural speech as a priority. With much anticipation on these utterances, corruption is still on the lips of ordinary Liberians as the main factor responsible for the collapse of Liberia �s political, economic and social structures. As a reality Liberians have seen unabated correlation of corruption of past and present governments on all levels. Can corruption be curtailed or not?
               
What can be done to get rid of Corruption?
 
Unfortunately, corruption will remain a factor until substantial changes of our political culture and economic structures have been achieved. There is no single cultural factor that inclines a society towards corruption, but economic factors play a big part. Most clearly, poverty and bribery go together. Liberia may be corrupt in many ways of interpretation because the country is poor and some individuals that are guarantors of public trust are not morally inclined to do away with many forms of corruption, especially bribery. Paul Wolfowitz, the World Bank Chief�s ideology about corruption is that corruption drags down a country�s development. While the World Bank Chief�s assertion may not sound entirely true, there are other factors that may also stifle development. In the Liberian case, bribery is a long-standing tradition which forms part of virtually all previous governments, including the present administration. Serial offenders know how to dress-up the exchange of bribery in method that they have designed without detection. Bribe-takers and bribe-payers have developed a scheme in which it is difficult for prosecutors to bring legal evidence to the fore. Although to totally eradicate corruption is hard, however, the new Liberia government has put in place some mechanisms to curb corruption but it is not enough. The Liberian president recently admitted that corruption still exists. How then can corruption be reduced?
 
The Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf administration must understand that civil servants are executors of corrupt politicians� will. Specific anti-corruption measures, such as depoliticizing the civil service system, are necessary. The strong need to improve the quality of officials through better training, pay and conditions, making sure that decision-making should be transparent with better account auditing. This is possible with the availability of resources and vitally the existence of political will to make administrative processes more accountable. In order to promote transparency, decision-making on important matters of national interest should not be made by an individual; rather appointed committees with the power to make decisions and the making of more rules with use of less discretion is necessary. Although increasing the salaries of officials and giving better rewards to those who report corruption may seem like a great start, however, such measure may not be necessary to curb corruption. Bribes may still take place among highly paid officials and high rewards might itself be further incentive for criminals to frame innocent officials. Another method of suppressing corruption is through the criminal justice system.
 
By catching and punishing illegal behavior, Liberia currently finds itself in a situation where the criminal justice system is plagued with lapses of needy logistics to prosecute culprits. For example, the legal process was largely futile for ex-NASSCORP officials who were accused of stealing plenty of money from public coffers. Admittance of jury bribery took precedence over the verdict that vindicated the ex-NASSCORP officials. Even with recent arrests and release of ex-officials of the Gyude Bryant administration without understanding how the legal process will later proceed, creates a murky professional outlook of our criminal justice system. Moreover, the prison system is ill-equipped for offenders to pay their dues as evidenced by recent escape of some hardcore criminals. The new administration is doing its best to reform public sector management as well as economic policies and the legal system, but the reality of growth may show up in figures later on if the administration continues to redesign and periodically reevaluate regulatory structures and procedures, which will help reduce opportunities for corruption. The so-called Good Governance Committee, which is headed by Amos Sawyer, is a convenient weapon to spot and evaluate institutional deficiencies. Overall, the promotion of education, strong competition among entrepreneurs, and the will to develop civil society and make accountability of public institutions a priority, will promote stability and growth.  
 
Corruption Cannot Stop Growth
 
It may be argued by economists that corruption slows the development of a country; a corrupt country nevertheless is capable of rapid growth. Corruption practices in America and Western Europe are nothing like pervasive as in other parts of the world. It is arguable that bribery is an integral part of law making. In the US , lobbyists are well accepted to make generous contribution to the campaign of congressmen. They exchange brown envelopes in the hallways. According to Brent Wilkes, a lobbyist who forms part in the bribery case of a Californian congressman told the New York Times that a check must never be handed over at the same time as lobbying is going on. It is better to wait and do it in a hallway later.   
 
Armstrong Williams, an American columnist and TV host, was paid $240,000 by the US Department of Education to comment regularly on George Bush�s �No Child Left Behind� education policy. Maggi Gallagher, another American columnist, was paid to promote the Bush administration�s �Healthy Marriage� program. The two named American journalists clearly violated ethics of journalism, however, they still have large audience of readers and listeners who believe their tthoughts on national policy issues. 
 
Several countries in Asia have grown rapidly at a time when cronyism was common, including Indonesia and South Korea in their time. Look at China today with its explosive growth. Ordinary Chinese still complain of corruption, though the government executes egregious offenders. The rapid growth of Liberia will depend on those that have the political will, patriotism, and the guts to make a change. Simply put, any hope that complete eradication of corruption in Liberia will promote rapid growth and development is just a fallacy and big excuse.

About The Author
Alex Redd works as a Counselor for Carson City School District in Nevada, USA. He can be reached at alredd23@yahoo.com
  

 

 

www.runningafrica.com
Powered by The African Media Network, Lawrenceville, GA USA.  Gabriel S. Gworlekaju Jr. President/CEO;  Patrick K. Manjoe Executive Director